�The Appeal to public� � polemic
reception, which essence consists that instead of a substantiation of the
validity or the falsehoods of the considered(examined) thesis begin to influence
feelings of the people, that prevents them to make objective, impartial opinion
on a point of issue. A version � of a reason to the man � (look.).
Argument (reason, basis) � the true judgement resulted(brought) for a substantiation of the validity or a falsehood of a stated rule(situation) (thesis). The argument is a component of any proof.
The argument � a way of a reasonings ensuring an argumentation and persuasiveness of performance(statement); set of arguments for the benefit of something.
To give reason � to prove, to result reasons, arguments.
�Attack by questions� � polemic reception consisting that the next statement the polemicsman finishes by a question to the opponent, forcing it(him) all time to answer questions.
�Returnable impact ("�boomerang") � Polemic reception consisting that any unreasoned or unfriendly performance(statement), application, retort directed against somebody, address against the author.
Question � the logic form including the information, and also instruction(indication) on its(her) insufficiency with the purpose of reception of the new information as the answer.
Debate � an exchange of opinions on any questions; disputes.
The demonstration (form, way of the proof) � a logic reasoning, during which of arguments (reasons) is deduced the validity or falsehood of the thesis.
Demonstration � a component of any proof.
Discussion � dispute, discussion any of a question at issue at assembly, in a seal, in conversation; public dispute with the purpose of finding - out of true, presence(finding) of the correct decision of a question at issue.
To discuss � to participate in discussion, to discuss something, to argue.
Disputation � public dispute on a scientific and public and important theme.
Disputman � the person participating in a disputation, in disputes.
�A Reason to the man� � polemic reception, which essence consists that instead of a substantiation of the validity or the falsehoods of the considered(examined) thesis begin to estimate advantages and lacks of the man, his(its) put forward.
Argumentation � validity of the thesis by arguments; major property of a correct reasoning.
Argumentation � convincing, representing the proof.
The proof � set of logic receptions of a substantiation of the validity any of judgement with the help of other rules(situations), which validity is already established.
Irony � the thin sneer expressed in the latent form.
Criticism of reasons of the opponent � way of a refutations consisting proving, that the arguments of the denied proof are false or are insolvent.
Logomachya � such dispute, when arguing, not having defined(determined) precisely of subject of dispute, deny each other or do not agree with each other only because use inexact words for expression of the ideas; and also dispute, which does not represent anything essentially important.
Maievtics � one of receptions of a method of the Socrat on an establishment of true. The essence of reception is, that the Socrat helped � birth think �: with the help of the skilfully put questions and received answers resulted the interlocutor in true knowledge.
�Does not "follow", the logic mistake in proof consisting �does not "follow" � that the thesis does not follow, does not follow from arguments, resulted(brought) in his(its) acknowledgement(confirmation).
Validity � important quality of correct thinking showing that in a reasoning all ideas lean(base) on others, which validity is proved.
The opponent � the person objecting to somebody in public conversation, disputation and �. Item; the opponent in dispute.
Refutation � the proof of a falsehood or inconsistency any of the thesis.
The refutation of demonstration � way of a refutations consisting in revealing that the thesis of the opposite party logically does not follow from arguments.
Refutation by the facts � polemic reception consisting that in the proof of a falsehood or the inconsistencies any of the thesis are resulted the valid subjects, phenomena, events contradicting to the thesis.
� The Basic error � (false basis) � a logic mistake in proof consisting that the thesis is proved by false arguments.
The answer � the statement, message caused by a question.
� Substitution of the thesis � � a logic mistake in proof consisting that one thesis deliberately or is not deliberately substituted by another and this new thesis begin to prove or to deny.
To polemize � to conduct polemic, to argue.
Polemic � dispute during discussion something; struggle of essentially opposite opinions on this or that question, public dispute with the purpose to protect to defend the point of view and to deny opinion of the opponent.
Polemicsman � the participant of dispute.
Polemic reception � a way of the proof either refutation of the validity or falsehood any of a rule(situation).
"Vicious circle" � a logic mistake in proof consisting that the thesis is deduced from arguments, and the arguments, in turn, are deduced from the same thesis.
� An Anticipation of the basis � � a logic mistake in proof consisting that the thesis leans(bases) on the unproved arguments.
Subject of dispute � of a rule(situation), judgement, which are subject to discussion by an exchange of the various points of view, comparison of different opinions.
Debate � discussion, public dispute on any questions.
Sarcasm � a venomous sneer, malicious irony.
� The Item of information to absurdity � � polemic reception, which essence is to show a falsehood of the thesis, as the consequences following from him(it), contradict the validity.
The sothism � logic dodge, deliberately erroneous reasoning, which is given out for true.
The sophisman � the man, which in the reasonings resorts to sothisms (look).
Sophistics � application in dispute or in the proofs of sothisms; verbal shifts entering in error.
Dispute � any collision of opinions, disagreement in the points of view on any question, subject; the struggle, at which each of the parties asserts the correctness.
The disputman � the man, which argues; the fan(amateur) of dispute.
It is required to prove the thesis � an idea or rule(situation), which validity.
Dodge � cunning, shift; dexterous reception, with which help want to facilitate dispute for itself and to complicate for the opponent.
Heristics � art to argue to conduct polemic, using thus by all receptions designed only winning the opponent.
Humour � without spiteful and mocking the attitude(relation) to something.
On work L.G. Pavlova. Dispute, discussion, polemic. М., "Education", 1991
Order books or Look through the site contents